BOOK REVIEW / In brief: Live From the Battlefield - Peter Arnett: Bloomsbury, pounds 17.99

Julie Flint
Sunday 20 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Peter Arnett has a genius for attracting fire. In 1965, one of President Johnson's aides called him 'more damaging to the US cause than a whole battalion of Vietcong', and almost 30 years after Vietnam, reporting from Baghdad for CNN at a moment of the Gulf War when all other television correspondents had been ordered out, the lesson learned in Vietnam - 'to believe only what my eyes had seen' - earned him fiercer criticism still. As Stormin' Norman Schwartzkopf dulled the critical senses of lesser journalists with video cassettes of 'smart' bombs destroying bridges but never lives, Arnett reported from Baghdad on the evidence of his eyes. He patiently testified to civilian casualties, and dared to say that what the Pentagon called a production facility for biological weapons had all the appearances of being just what the Iraqis claimed it was, a factory that had produced nothing more lethal than milk powder.

It was only when other journalists were permitted back into Baghdad that Arnett learned how controversial his reporting had been. He had been denounced on the floor of the US Congress as 'the Joseph Goebbels of Saddam Hussein's Hitler-like regime', and CNN bureaus had been picketed by protestors demanding that he be silenced. British MPs had called him a turncoat.

It is presumably the notoriety of Baghdad that has persuaded Arnett to publish in Britain. But however excellent a reporter he is, and however familiar his voice became during the bombing of Baghdad, it is doubtful whether this book will generate much interest here. Arnett offers no new insights into Iraq, where his minders kept him on a predictably tight rein, and focuses instead on the distant past, reserving almost three-quarters of his pages for Vietnam experiences already chronicled - brilliantly - by such former colleagues as Neil Sheehan and David Halberstam. Writing after them, Arnett all too often sounds not 'live', but a distant echo.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in