between the lines
How John Gielgud's musical verse-speaking impressed a youthful Michael Denison
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I grew up theatrically watching John Gielgud in the 1930s, but it's his famous role-swapping 1935 Romeo and Juliet that left the greatest mark. It began with Olivier playing Mercutio, and Gielgud Romeo. Then they swapped. It was very instructive because their styles were so different. John was the more musical, Larry the more vital. The thing is, Larry should have been better in both parts but he hadn't mastered the verse like John. John had the speaking voice, but also a capacity to illuminate the text by his speed of thought. Larry, in those days, was more deliberate. When I played Romeo at drama school, John's tunes rang in my head. I should add I'd become an actor because in 1937 Gielgud co-directed Richard II at Oxford University, bringing the young Vivien Leigh to play the Queen. Before, I'd never wanted to act. Afterwards, I wanted nothing else.
That no one speaks verse like Gielgud any more is a loss. Of course, tastes in verse-speaking change. Today's mood is more down-to-earth. But that doesn't automatically mean it conveys subtle emotion better. It's interesting that every generation's great stars are seen as more "real" than their predecessors. It's like hemlines. The mini-skirt was a shock. Then we got used to it. Now young women have skirts to their ankles again. Likewise, Gielgud's delivery might sound unrealistic today, but realism is always relative.
n Michael Denison is in 'An Ideal Husband', Theatre Royal Haymarket, London(0171-930 8800)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments