Backgammon

Chris Bray
Saturday 27 November 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ONE OF the best features of Kit Woolsey's online backgammon magazine GammOnLine is a match between Kit and the readers. It proceeds at the rate of one move each per day, with Kit commenting on the plays.

This is a tremendous way to improve your game, as it really gives you the time to study each move in a way that you cannot do over the board. You can use computers to help you in your analysis, if you wish. The readers vote on the possible options, with the majority choice becoming the selected move.

This position is from the first game of the current match. The readers had two real choices with their 31: a) 24/23, 16/13; and b)13/10, 11/10.

My instinctive thought was to choose a). It safeties a loose blot and prepares to escape the last man. The advantage of b) is that it creates a broken five-point prime, but the disadvantage is that it leaves a blot. The fact that Kit had four men behind this prime is a major factor in choosing between the two moves.

It's very difficult quickly to balance the pros and cons of the two plays, and over the board I am sure I would have played a). The voting on this move was very close, showing the difficulty of the decision; but b) won by a narrow margin and thus it was the move eventually played.

Later computer analysis showed this to be the right play by a small margin, and demonstrates the quality of Kit's readership.

GammOnLine is found at www.gammonline.com

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in