Record-breaking Gaugin: What makes it worth $300m?
Our expert delivers his appreciation of painting that portrays seductive Tahitian models
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Paul Gauguin began the first of his two extended visits to the post-paradisal world of Tahiti – French colonisers had succeeded in smudging out its innocence – in 1891, and the consequence of these visits was a tumult of paintings, some of which were very good indeed, and others less so.
This one is among the best of them and, unlike many of the others, it is in fine condition thanks to the fact that it has been within the custodianship of a museum. Hence the far-fetched price.
Gauguin, being a calculating, ex-financial man, with an eye ever inclined towards the Parisian art market (with which he was in regular contact thanks to a very good postal service), loved to mystify and to myth-make.
His Tahitian females are usually seductively impassive models of sexual allure, crouching panther-like as if ready to spring (as here). Or they brood. Or they stand, statuesque and bare-breasted, as if they were freshly awakened spirit beings of great natural beauty and startling youthfulness. Or they lie on their sides, dreaming dreams whose meanings are surely known only to the equally mystifying local gods, which are often represented in these works, though not here. In short, they are all near-perfect models of male commodification.
The baffling Tahitian phrase which Gauguin gives as the painting’s title (Nafea faa ipoipo - helpfully translated into English: 'When will you marry?') is one that, according to Gauguin, a great self-publicist, was often tossed in his direction.
Here the European influence rubs up (almost literally) against the local: the woman who crouches in front is in Tahitian dress, the one who overlooks her in European. As so often with Gauguin, the painting pleases us by its general sinuousness: that lake, the shapely tree, the way its elements seem to meld together so smoothly and so harmoniously, as if squeezed down upon one another horizontally.
As we see in the painting, Gauguin was a master of harmonious colour relationships. His juxtapositions surprise and please but, unlike, say, the Fauves, who came shrieking so soon after, they never jar. This adds so much to their sensual allure. That colour warmth contextualises so pleasingly the inscrutable female gaze, as if offering it up to us on a heated plate.
So she seems to be edging towards us, teasingly, pouting deliciously, and twisting her lovely feet as if they were twists of liquorice.
Unlike so many other fantastical Gauguin Tahitians, she may even be about to smile. Her older, stern-faced companion on the other hand, tricked out like a European, may yet restrain her for modesty – or morality’s – sake. Gauguin may not get his catch after all.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments