Julian Spalding challenges Tate director to public debate over Hirst exhibition
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Julian Spalding, who has headed some of Britain's foremost public galleries, has laid down a gauntlet in a letter to the Tate director, challenging him to a public debate to justify why the art gallery has spent taxpayers’ money on a Hirst exhibition when the “works aren’t art”.
Three weeks ago, the senior museum figure delivered a stark condemnation of Damien Hirst and other contemporary “con artists”, urging collectors to “sell why they can” because his works are “worthless”.
Spalding, former head of Glasgow, Sheffield and Manchester museums, has written to Sir Nicholas Serota, the Tate director, spurred by an explosion of worldwide interest since The Independent published Spalding’s attack last month.
The letter, seen by The Independent, reads: “My serious allegation is that the exhibition of Hirst is a misuse of public funds because his works aren’t art. The immense support I have received …around the world demonstrates that this is… a widely-held public view.
“Public figures need to be accountable for their decisions in public. The bankers responsible for the credit collapse were. So I think you need to be for allowing a phoney avant-garde to become the establishment...”
The Tate declined to comment, saying only that Sir Nicholas was abroad.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments