Constable painting sells for £3.5m just 18 months after selling for £3,500
Sotheby's gets one up on Christie's after the latest New York bidding war
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A John Constable painting has sold at auction for almost £3.5 million, just eighteen months after it was bought for £3,500.
Christie’s valued the piece at a far lower price in 2013 after believing it to the work of a fan, but Constable authority Anne Lyles later confirmed that it was in fact by the Suffolk master himself.
Close inspection and careful cleaning revealed that amateur restorers had painted over the authentic piece, believed to be one of Constable’s 1830 sketches for the £23 million artwork, “Salisbury Cathedral from the Meadows”, that now hangs in London’s Tate.
The piece was sold to an anonymous buyer after a fierce bidding war, with Sotheby’s describing the result as “wonderful”.
The artwork was given an estimate of between £1.3 and £1.9 million by Sotheby’s in New York, and some experts believe Lady Hambleden, the owner who sold it to Christie’s will now have a case to sue.
“We are aware that Sotheby’s are offering this work as by Constable,” Christie’s said in a statement prior to the auction.
“We took the view at the time of our sale in 2013 that it was by a “follower of”. We understand that there is no clear consensus of expertise on the new attribution.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments