ART / Critical round-up

Tuesday 01 December 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SICKERT AT THE ROYAL ACADEMY

'It is not that every picture in the very well chosen exhibition succeeds - Sickert is far too experimental and ambitious an artist for that - but that he brought his own quirky intellect, humour and feel for the craft of painting to everything on view.' Richard Dorment, Daily Telegraph.

'Too English for the French, who remain largely ignorant of him, too French for the English to accommodate readily, Sickert is still something of an odd-man-out, sui generis.' William Packer, FT.

'(Sickert) saw the stuffed birds in the glass dome, the hefty potential victim. While Augustus John and his swan- necked retinue went gypsy caravanning, Sickert grubbed around in genuine headline material.' William Feaver, Observer.

'He was always an uneven painter, and some of the show's weakest pictures date from this difficult period. Then, quite suddenly, he used a photograph of himself eating cereal as the basis of a wonderfully energetic canvas called Lazarus breaks his fast.' Richard Cork, Times.

'Sickert was not a great painter because he was an innovator, but because through all his innovations he managed to achieve one thing. He painted with immense feeling, without ever turning lachrymose.' Andrew Graham-Dixon, Independent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in