Letter: National Parks: own worst enemy

A. D. Evans
Thursday 20 February 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Stephen Goodwin, in his report on the National Parks ("Business ploughs a green furrow", 17 February), helps to perpetuate the Parks myth by referring to them as "England and Wales's finest countryside". This is nonsense. The National Parks are, for the most part, upland areas, prone to a hostile climate at almost any time of year, and with very little of what the average Briton would class as "countryside".

The Parks are their own worst enemy. By so labelling themselves, they invite day-trippers. But their upland terrain seriously restricts communications, so that tourists in (for example) the Yorkshire Dales who wish to travel north-south are limited to just two or three single-track roads linking one dale to the next. Likewise, the various passes in the Lake District.

The best of the countryside is, perversely but perhaps fortunately, in those areas which are either more discreetly labelled (Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty; Environmentally Sensitive Areas) or not labelled at all. Shropshire and Dorset come immediately to mind.

The sooner we debunk the myth of the National Parks, the better. The Scots, remember, have no National Parks at all. If they feel no need for them, why do we hang on to this idea in the South?

A D EVANS

Nottingham

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in