Letter: Booking a future role for Britain's public libraries
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Is David Lister suggesting the Library Association should not campaign vigorously against proposals to cut public library services ('Book sales rise as fewer borrow from libraries', 3 March)? Surely not. It could be argued that it has been because of our campaigns that the public library service is as good as it is and that there are still 5,000 libraries up and down the country, lending nearly 600 million books a year.
But the point of our campaign last year, and the centre of our concern this year, is not so much the overall picture but specific proposals for drastic cuts. It cannot be right that a great city central library is shut one whole day a week, that a council in the North-east reduced the opening hours of all its libraries by 62 per cent, that one county library system ceased buying any national newspapers, or that two other county libraries decided to close a dozen branches.
Such closures and retrenchments (which are only examples) reduce people's access to libraries and the books and information they provide. In many of the communities served by public libraries, there are no bookshops at all.
Neither is it true that people are switching from borrowing to buying. According to another piece of research published this week (Books and the Consumer), 'the more reading that is done, the more books are bought and . . . the greater the use of public libraries'. That is how it should be. People need access to attractive, stock-holding bookshops and to well-funded public libraries. It remains our concern that, despite their popularity, despite their vital role at the heart of our democracy, in some parts of the country public libraries are being starved of the small amount of money they need to flourish.
Yours sincerely,
ROSS SHIMMON
Chief Executive
The Library Association
London, WC1
3 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments