Facebook and Instagram say new changes could force them to stop working in Europe

Threat comes as Irish data regulators explore new rules

Adam Smith
Tuesday 22 September 2020 12:01 BST
Comments
(Brett Jordan)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Facebook might not be able to provide its platforms in Europe under new regulatory changes, it has threatened.

The company said it would not be able operate on the continent if it cannot move user data between Europe and the United States.

The Irish Data Protection Commissioner had suggested that it would enforce a European Court of Justice ruling that would mean such data transfers would breach General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

“It is not clear to [Facebook] how, in those circumstances, it could continue to provide the Facebook and Instagram services in the EU,” wrote Yvonne Cunnane, Facebook Ireland’s head of data protection and associate general counsel.

“The above views, if adopted, are likely to have significant diverse effects on [Facebook] and on the many millions of individuals and businesses who use its services”, it also says.

The company claims 410 million monthly active users in Europe, including charities, organisations, politicians, and other public figures.

Around 25 million businesses apparently use its business in Europe as of January 2020.

Cunnane accused the regulators of bias against Facebook, and said that the three week time period during which the company could make submissions against the ruling “will give little weight to those submissions and that they will not dislodge, or be capable of lodging, the view which has already been arrived at” by the commission.

She also says that the implications of the judgement are wide-ranging, and that a one-size-fits-all apparently cannot be taken.

“I believe and am advised that it is neither fair nor appropriate that [Facebook] should be the only entity subject to investigation and to face the possible suspension of data transfers to the US” it continues.

“Facebook is not threatening to withdraw from Europe. Legal documents filed with the Irish High Court set out the simple reality that Facebook, and many other businesses, organisations and services, rely on data transfers between the EU and the US in order to operate their services”, the company said in a statement.

“A lack of safe, secure and legal international data transfers would damage the economy and hamper the growth of data-driven businesses in the EU, just as we seek a recovery from COVID-19”.

The Independent has reached out to the Irish DPC for comment.

Whether or not Facebook will indeed disable its services in Europe remains to be seen, but privacy experts have alleged that it would not.

“The idea that Facebook would withdraw from the European market is absurd brinksmanship that I don’t think anyone truly believes,” Michael Veale, a technology policy researcher at University College London, told Vice

Facebook is not the only company with concerns over moving users’ data. 

Following Brexit, Google users in Britain are no longer protected by GDPR and therefore user data will be moved to the United States. 

Google claims that the change would not see any difference in data protection standards, something that is rebuked by privacy activists.

“Moving people's personal information to the USA makes it easier for mass surveillance programmes to access it," said Jim Killock, executive director of Open Rights Group, to The Independent.

"There is nearly no privacy protection for non-US citizens.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in