The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
Was Daniel Radcliffe suspended from Twitter? No – despite Musk’s crackdown on parody accounts
Rumour appears to have originated with Weird Al Yankovic
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Reports that Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe was banned from Twitter under Elon Musk’s new rules appear to be false, The Independent has found.
Numerous Twitter users and some news outlets shared claims on Monday that the 33-year-old actor was among the celebrities who had their accounts suspended for impersonating Mr Musk.
The rumour appeared to have begun with a tweet from ‘Weird’ Al Yankovic, the musical parody artist whom Radcliffe is portraying in a new Hollywood biopic, who said: “Oh no, they suspended @danielradcliffe’s Twitter account! Wasn’t it obvious he was doing a PARODY???”
But according to the Internet Archive, the account @danielradcliffe had already become inactive some time between September 2009 and August 2011, when the Archive’s automated checks began being redirecting to Twitter’s “account suspended” page.
Indeed, Radcliffe is well-known for not using social media, saying in 2020: “I considered getting a Twitter, and I 100 per cent know that if I did, you all would be waking up to stories of, like, ‘Dan Radcliffe gets into fight with random person on Twitter’.”
Representatives of Radcliffe have been asked for comment. Twitter has also been asked for comment, but most of its PR staff were laid off last week by Mr Musk.
In other words, @danielradcliffe never was the real Radcliffe and may have been suspended years ago, while Yankovic, a celebrated comedian, appears to have been making a joke.
Celebrities including comedians Kathy Griffin and Sarah Silverman, Mad Men actor Rich Sommer, and former NFL commentator Chris Kluwe had their accounts suspended after changing their names to “Elon Musk”, adopting a facsimile of the tycoon’s avatar, and making parody tweets.
Mr Musk, who announced after buying the social network last month that “comedy is now legal on Twitter”, said on Sunday that anyone who impersonated another user “without clearly specifying ‘parody’” would be permanently suspended without a warning.
Twitter has always banned impersonation, and especially frowned upon verified users changing their names to parody other people, because the blue checkmarks on their profiles makes it easier for people to mistake them for the real thing.
In the past, however, Twitter issued a warning before banning such users. Mr Musk has also previously said he doesn’t believe in permanent bans.
The site does not give any information about why and when a suspended user was banned.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments