Large parts of the Moon are much older than previously thought, scientists say
New data resets the clock on just how old the ‘man in the Moon’ patterns are
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Much of the Moon’s surface is about 200 million years older than we previously thought, scientists have announced.
Researchers studying the craters on our nearest neighbour say they have reset the clock on how it was formed, and that it is actually much older than previously believed.
Scientists from Norway and France made the discovery after finding a new way to co-ordinate and calibrate different systems used to date the lunar surface.
The new evaluation indicates that large parts of the crust of the Moon are much older than previously thought, and allows the scientists to clarify the sequence of events in the evolution of its surface.
The Moon is now geologically pretty inactive, meaning that the craters from asteroids and comets which bombarded it throughout time have not been eroded away.
Presenting the work at the Goldschmidt Geochemistry Conference in Lyon, Professor Stephanie Werner, of the Centre for Planetary Habitability, University of Oslo, said: “Looking at the signs of these impacts on the Moon shows what Earth would be like without the geological churning of plate tectonics which took place here on Earth.
“What we have done is to show that large portions of the lunar crust are around 200 million years older than had been thought.”
Researchers have known that the standard way of measuring the age of the surface of the Moon - a process known as crater counting - gave quite different results to that seen when examining rocks from the Apollo missions.
So they decided to reconcile the differences by correlating individually dated Apollo samples to the number of craters in the sample site surrounding area - in effect, resetting the crater clock.
They also correlated them against data from various Moon missions, especially the Indian Chandrayaan-1, to be sure which Apollo sample belongs to the surface in which we counted craters.
According to the scientists, by doing this they were able resolve the discrepancy and push back the age of the surface of the Moon by up to 200 million years.
For example, the age of the Imbrium Basin - visible in the top left quadrant of the Moon and which was probably created by the collision of an asteroid impactor around the size of Sicily - goes back from 3.9 billion years ago, to 4.1 billion years ago.
The researchers stress their findings do not change the estimates of the Moon‘s age itself, just the estimate of its surface.
Prof Werner said: “This is an important difference.
“It allows us to push back in time an intense period of bombardment from space, which we now know took place before extensive volcanic activity that formed the ‘Man in the Moon‘ patterns - the mare volcanic plains including Mare Imbrium.
“As this happened on the Moon, the Earth was almost certain to have also suffered this earlier bombardment too.”
Additional reporting by Press Association
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments