Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The actions of the flight engineer on board the AF4590 will be crucial in piecing together the final moments in the cockpit before the Concorde crashed.
The actions of the flight engineer on board the AF4590 will be crucial in piecing together the final moments in the cockpit before the Concorde crashed.
Concorde is one of the few commercial aircraft that needs a third member of the flight crew as well as the pilot and co-pilot. It is the engineer's job to monitor the four engines during take-off.
A retired aviation engineer who worked on British Concordes said the engineer's unusual role was down to the aircraft's complexity. "The pilot doesn't even see all the dials so the flight engineer would have had to tell the captain," he said. "He should have been the first to know of any problem with the engine. The investigators will be looking closely at his actions during take-off."
British Airways pilots said yesterday it should have been possible to land the plane despite the engine failure and expressed surprise that the crew did not raise the undercarriage to make it more controllable. One pilot said: "We can't understand why they didn't get the gear up. Maybe they were distracted or there was a major problem other than the flaming engine.
"I have spoken to some of our Concorde pilots and they believe they might have been able to save the plane if the flaming engine was the only fault. But the undercarriage would have to have been raised," he said.
However aviation expert Kieran Daly, editor of the internet news service Air Transport Intelligence, said it was impossible to say if the crew could have done more. "If there was catastrophic damage to an engine that was so rapid and enormous, then the aircraft could not be saved," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments