Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Coat firm loses fight against cheap labour

David Usborne
Thursday 03 April 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

New York - Can the industrial nations of the West fight back against competition from low-wage workers in the developing world? The evidence from the once-mighty US apparel industry in the last few days is that it is fighting a losing battle, writes David Usborne.

The raincoat manufacturer London Fog, a household name in the US, has said it is to close its last remaining US factory. The plant, which employs 280 workers in Baltimore, represented a unique experiment to withstand the logic of shifting production to countries where wage costs are lower.

The Baltimore government two years ago gave London Fog almost $2m (pounds 1.2m) in incentives to keep the factory open, and the union agreed to a $1.25 cut in hourly wages. Now the company concedes even with that help, making coats in the US is not viable. "The lower cost of goods manufactured by overseas contractors, as compared to US-based costs, has forced us to join our competitors in placing the remaining portion of our business with offshore contractors," said the chairman, Robert Gregory.

In the debate about the benefits and costs of global free trade, textile workers have long been identified as the group most wounded by the process.

In the primary races of the 1996 presidential elections, Republican contender Patrick Buchanan singled out the earlier closures by London Fog to support his platform in favour of reasserting trade controls.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in