Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

NSPCC is accused of Climbie cover-up

Terri Judd
Saturday 26 January 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of the country's most respected children's charities was accused of altering documents yesterday to cover up its failure to save Victoria Climbie from abuse and death.

Lord Laming's inquiry into one of the worst child abuse cases in Britain was told the eight-year-old was referred to the NSPCC's Tottenham Child and Family Centre seven months before her death. It took a week for her case to be assessed, it was claimed, because staff were preoccupied organising an office party.

The charity initially provided the inquiry with a photocopy of a document relating to Victoria's case, which had all staff names erased and a note at the bottom stating "accepted for ongoing service".

When the chairman demanded the original be produced, a second – apparently identical form – was handed over. It, however, read "no further action" on the bottom. Lord Laming described the inconsistencies as of "great and widespread concern".

There have been public suggestions that Victoria's initial referral papers may have been changed after her death in February 2000 to explain why nothing had been done to help.

A spokesman for the inquiry added: "Lord Laming takes these allegations extremely seriously and will consider them in full before proceeding with his final inquiry report."

Earlier, Sylvia Henry, an NSPCC social worker who had been assigned Victoria's case, was accused of adding a note to the file after her murder in "an effort to explain away the fact that you had done nothing with this referral for months and months and months?"

"No, I dispute that," she replied. Ms Henry had noted that she had contacted North Tottenham social services, who told her the family had moved out of the borough and the case was closed. Social services denied the conversation took place, pointing out the family were still being seen by the department in December 1999 – four months after the NSPCC referral.

Yesterday the charity said: "Despite suggestions to the contrary, we have found no evidence of deception or falsification of NSPCC records."

Outside the hearing a spokeswoman added: "This case was not referred to the centre as child abuse – nor did the information given present a full, accurate picture of Victoria's situation.

"However, it did raise some concerns which the NSPCC fully accepts should have alerted the centre to the possibility that she was at risk of harm and that more appropriate action could have been taken."

The NSPCC family centre, which was described during the inquiry as a "shambles", closed in March 2000.

Victoria suffered a "miserable and lonely" death, having been "imprisoned, beaten and starved" for months on end by her father's aunt Marie Therese Kouao, 45, and her partner Carl Manning, 28, at a flat in Tottenham, north London.

The two of them were able to inflict terrible injuries – 128 at the time of her death. When they were jailed last January for life for murder, the Government launched an "urgent" inquiry into how four authorities, two police child protection teams and two hospitals had failed to save Victoria.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in