BBC Scotland staff attack `Panorama'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Deep divisions emerged yesterday between BBC journalists in Scotland and executives in London over the corporation's handling of the Panorama affair.
Staff at the BBC's Scottish headquarters in Glasgow passed a resolution condemning the decision by Tony Hall, the BBC's managing director of news and current affairs, and John Birt, the director general, to schedule the interview with John Major only three days before local elections in Scotland.
The National Union of Journalists' resolution, approved unanimously, said managers had displayed "arrogance" and "ignorance". They should admit they had "made a mistake".
Reporters expressed angerthat Mr Hall and Mr Birt had not foreseen the furore their decision would cause in Scotland.
One said: "They have displayed breathtaking stupidity. They knew they could face a challenge over our impartiality rules but they decided to press on regardless, in the hope that Scots would just lie down and accept it. Well, ordinary Scots won't, BBC reporters who value the corporation's integrity won't, politicians won't and neither will the most senior judge in the land. "
The former controller of BBC Scotland, Patrick Chalmers, said that the courts had "helped to save the reputation of the BBC",which had "caved in" to pressure from leading Tories.
John Wilson, controller of BBC editorial policy until 1993 and author of the BBC's programme guidelines, said: "No politician or political party should be given a substantial, contrived, one-sided appearance, so close to elections."
He was dismissive of fears that the judgement would compel future programmes to be balanced in the run-up to elections.
Some BBC staff also reacted with dismay: "They have chosen such a bad case to fight on," one political correspondent said. Another senior correspondent said: "Everyone knows Thursday's elections are a referendum on the Government's record."
Critics pointed out that the BBC in previous years had bent over backwards not to be seen as partial.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments