Plan aims to set aside more land
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NEW MEASURES to pay farmers more money for taking land out of production in set-aside schemes were proposed yesterday by the Government, just as the Prince of Wales, speaking at a Crofters' Union conference in Stornoway, attacked such policies, writes Oliver Gillie.
The government scheme proposes using set-aside land for environmentally productive purposes such as providing pasture for wild geese, or creating corridors for wildlife at the margins of fields and along waterways. John Gummer, Minister for Agriculture, announced a package of proposals for consultation which would mean spending an extra pounds 31m over three years on environmentally sensitive projects.
The scheme will pay farmers to provide access to the public on certain set-aside land and offer new options for managing it. Farmers might for example be paid to seed meadowland with wild grass and flowers, while at the same time allowing the public free access. Farmers may also be paid to provide specialised habitats for wildlife.
Mr Gummer also proposed a major extension of set-aside which will take some land out of production for 20 years. This would allow for the improvement of wildlife habitats.
The Prince of Wales predicted that set-aside schemes would fail in Europe as they have in the US. He said the schemes would cost jobs and fail to achieve their aim of cutting food mountains because farmers would simply increase the yield from land they still cultivated.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments