Politics means arms impasse is likely to stay
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Although many uncertainties surround the Irish peace process, observers in Ireland have been practically unanimous on one central point: that the IRA is unlikely to de-commission any of its weaponry in the foreseeable future, writes David McKittrick.
This is because of a complex of political factors which, together with the fact that Ireland has no history of decommissioning, appear to make it next to impossible for republican leaders to attempt such a move.
Most people in political circles regard this as a source of regret, since in any society it is clearly preferable to take as many illegal arms as possible out of circulation.
But from the start almost all nationalist representatives have been much more relaxed than the British government about the prospects of the guns not being handed over. This is because of the widespread view that the crucial point is not the existence of the arms, but the existence of the intention to use them.
Curiously, this view is also held by a number of senior security figures. Unionist politicians, by contrast, support the British government's stance.
It is almost certainly the case that one reason for not decommissioning is that doing so would decrease Sinn Fein's negotiating muscle. At the same time, the psychology of the IRA and Sinn Fein is so much against decommissioning that it is unlikely the IRA leadership could hand over weapons, even if it wished to.
Republicans are adamant that the year-old IRA ceasefire was a considered disengagement from the "armed struggle." Any handover of arms would inevitably be seen as a sign of surrender. As senior RUC officers have said on a number of occasions, the IRA ceasefire came about despite opposition from some parts of the movement, particularly in the hardline rural areas of south Armagh and east Tyrone.
Their initial misgivings have if anything probably increased as, in republican eyes, the British government has responded to the ceasefire at a snail's pace. Any move towards decommissioning might well convince them that they had been conned by Gerry Adams and the others who reassured them that the IRA was disengaging and not surrendering.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments