Neurosurgeon quits over waiting lists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A senior neurosurgeon today describes how he resigned as head of a hospital department after accountants forced its standards to plummet. Christopher Adams spent 20 years as head of the Department of Neurological Surgery at the Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford.
He says that between 1972 and 1994, it increased the number of treatment procedures from 600 to more than 2,500, making it one of the most efficient and cheaply-run units in the country. But Mr Adams was instructed to form a waiting list of at least three months for sciatica patients to save money. This was despite evidence that early treatment for such patients produced better recovery. Up to then the unit had no waiting list.
Writing in the British Medical Journal, Mr Adams tells how his pleas for more resources fell on deaf ears: By the end of 1994, staff were exhausted and referring hospitals were becoming unhappy with delays in admitting patients and the way they were being discharged early.
In January this year, Mr Adams decided private patients would have to be removed to make more room for NHS patients, although this meant an inevitable fall in income. He wrote to the hospital chief executive complaining that the department had moved from being "efficient" to "hyperefficient", which was unsafe. When he received no reply, he resigned as lead consultant.
He blamed the problems on the accountancy rules of the market-driven NHS.
Commenting on his paper, BMA chairman Dr Sandy Macara said: "This is salutary and sad evidence of the validity of our criticism of the NHS 'reforms' which are having the reverse effect of what they were intended to achieve...It is perverse that a hospital unit which was particularly effective and efficient has suffered most because of the internal market.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments