Health: Ovaries taken out without woman's knowledge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A woman who had an operation in a private hospital during which her ovaries were removed without her consent only found out when she went to pay the bill.
Jackie Bartley noticed an item for hormone replacement therapy and thought there must have been a mistake. She discovered that her surgeon, John Studd, one of the country's leading gynaecologists, had inserted HRT pellets to take over the function of her missing ovaries.
Yesterday, Mr Studd, director of the fertility unit at the private Lister hospital in London and a member of the council of the Royal College of Obstetricians, appeared before the General Medical Council accused of serious professional misconduct.
The operation, carried out at the Lister hospital in 1992, had been for stress incontinence. Mrs Bartley had consented to a hysterectomy but not to the removal of her ovaries and the discovery of what the surgeon had done "left me feeling like a piece of meat," she told the disciplinary hearing.
Mr Studd said he had removed her ovaries after discovering that she was suffering from thickening of the lining of her womb. He denied that there was insufficient medical justification to remove her ovaries without her consent.
Mrs Bartley was awarded pounds 32,500 in an out-of-court settlement in July 1995 after she sued Mr Studd.
She told the hearing that she had been upset and distressed when she discovered what had happened and had angrily confronted Mr Studd. He had said: "Apart from being mad at me, how are you?" She said he apologised and said it was unforgivable that he had not consulted her.
The hearing continues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments