Environment: Whale deal links ban and local culls
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A global sanctuary for whales- to be supported by the British Government at the International Whaling Commission meeting in Monaco next week - has left environmentalists in turmoil because it would allow coastal whaling.
A steep rise in the number of whales being killed this year by Japan and Norway has led Britain to join an international effort to ban all high seas whaling in return for allowing coastal whaling for the first time in 11 years.
Conservationists, led by Greenpeace, are opposed in principle to coastal whaling.They want a ban on all whaling and an end to trade in whale products. "We support a global sanctuary but not coastal whaling. Whales are no respecters of territorial limits," said a Greenpeace spokesman.
The idea of a sanctuary was put forward by Ireland and amounts to a political trade off in an attempt to regain some of the killing. Norway and Japan are using a loophole in the 1986 whaling ban allowing catches for "scientific" purposes to nearly double their haul in the last four years.
There are now around 1,000 whales being killed each year, outside the control of the IWC. Eliot Morley, the agriculture minister, said the present situation is "not satisfactory" and Britain may support a shift of policy but only if it leads to "a significant, and permanent, reduction in the number of whales being killed each year".
The plan would not halt whaling by the Norwegians, who get most of their catch in coastal waters, but it would hit the Japanese who go whaling in Antartica and the North Pacific.
The environmental groups will be out in force at the IWC next week, although no decision is expected to made. Whitehall sources said a deal could be reached next year in Oman.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments