Newmarch departure from Pru stuns City
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Mick Newmarch, chief executive of Prudential, Britain's biggest insurer, shocked the industry yesterday by resigning just weeks before the Stock Exchange is due to report on a controversial share sale he made last October. Mr Newmarch was criticised when he exercised share options hours before the release by the Securities and Investments Board of a crucial report on pensions transfers after whch the Prudential share price fell in common with other insurers. Mr Newmarch exercised a block of share options at 198.9p and sold the shares at 296p netting a profit of £203,000.
But the company said last night that Mr Newmarch had not resigned specifically over the Stock Exchange inquiry into his share dealings. Prudential said Mr Newmarch offered his resignation because "he found that the current relationship between the UK retail financial services regulators and both himself and the company has become unacceptable to him and he feels he is being put in an unacceptable position with regard to his position as chief executive of Prudential Corporation".
The Pru's statement added that the company believed Mr Newmarch had acted properly in his share dealings.
Keith Bedell-Pearce, a fellow-director and one of the leading internal candidates to replace Mr Newmarch, said the Exchange's inquiry was the straw that broke the camel's back.
"The questions raised about the share options just added to his feeling that he was becoming increasingly beleaguered. He felt he was having to spend too much time dealing with the nitty-gritty of regulatory issues. He felt the industry as a whole was beleaguered and without friends."
Mr Newmarch has been the industry's most trenchant critic of the financial services regulatory regime and had refused to join the new Personal Investment Authority, set up to regulate the sale of financial services to the public. He argued for statutory regulation of the industry rather than the self-regulation represented by the PIA. A Pru spokesman said the board unanimously backed Mr Newmarch's stance on regulation and that the Pru still had no intention of joining the PIA.
Mr Newmarch, who spent his entire career with the Pru, was appointed chief executive in 1990 and was paid £834,068 last year. A spokesman said that any compensation was a matter for discussion but that Mr Newmarch's three-year rolling contract would not be relevant as he had resigned.
Brian Corby, the Pru's chairman, has taken over as chief executive.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments