Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Governor backs watchdog merger

Diane Coyle
Thursday 29 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

DIANE COYLE

Economics Correspondent

Eddie George, Governor of the Bank of England, hinted last night that he would favour some mergers between financial regulators to improve consumer protection.

His remarks will be seen as lending the Bank's support to proposals for a single body such as the Securities and Investments Board to take responsibility for the regulation of retail financial products.

Mr George also said it was essential for the quality of people involved in regulation and co-operation between regulators to improve.

Mr George stressed, in a speech to financiers in Edinburgh, that the regulation of financial services was bound to be complex because of the wide variety of financial institutions and products. The only answer, he argued, was close co-operation between different regulators, including those overseas.

However, he added: ''That does not necessarily mean that some further institutional consolidation of the regulatory structure is not worth undertaking.

"There are many ways of skinning this particular cat and it may well be that in some areas consolidation would make co-operation, between some domestic regulators at least, easier to achieve.''

Mr George said yesterday there was a trade-off between protecting investors and the financial system and imposing excessive costs of regulation.

Retail consumers did need special protection, he added. There was ''essentially a social argument for protecting consumers, who necessarily rely upon purportedly expert financial advice and assistance, against being sold a pup.''

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in