Bid to bill students for pounds 20,000
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans which would leave students more than pounds 20,000 in debt when they finished university would prevent working-class teenagers from doing degrees, unions claimed last night.
The university vice-chancellors, who are debating the proposal at their annual meeting in Sheffield this week, were also accused of "kite-flying" in an attempt to win more money for higher education.
Their proposed submission to Sir Ron Dearing's review of higher education says students should have to take out loans for the whole cost of their maintenance - pounds 4,475 per year - plus a third of their tuition - about pounds 2,400 per year.
The plan is unlikely to be accepted by the review, however. All three political parties look likely to conclude that while students should pay for their own living costs, their education should be free.
The Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals has argued for the past three years for a system similar to the one which exists in Australia, where students pay back part of their tuition fees.
They want the money to be borrowed from the banks at slightly above the base lending rate, and paid back through the national insurance system.
Rodney Bickerstaffe, general secretary of the public service union Unison, said the principle of free tuition ensured that the brightest young people could be educated regardless of their backgrounds.
"This is education for the rich and the devil take the rest. It will add to the danger of Britain becoming a low-skill, low-wage economy," he said.
"If we want a successful, well-trained workforce to take us into the next millennium, the country cannot afford to abandon this principle."
David Triesman, general secretary of the Association of University Teachers, said his members accepted that the tax-payer could no longer afford to fund the expanded higher education system.
A 3 per cent tax on limited companies' profits could raise up to pounds 4bn per year, he said. The vice-chancellors' plans would raise up to pounds 6bn.
"I think the vice-chancellors are flying a kite, and that this is likely to scare everybody witless. I suspect they can't be 100 per cent serious," he said.
A Labour spokesman said it did not propose asking students to contribute towards the cost of fees. "Once you start doing that, where do you draw the line? The danger is that you would end up with students paying all their fees," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments