Charities barred from endorsing health foods

Severin Carrell
Sunday 08 May 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Major charities involved in fighting cancer and heart disease could lose millions of pounds a year under proposals from Brussels to ban them from endorsing healthy foods.

Major charities involved in fighting cancer and heart disease could lose millions of pounds a year under proposals from Brussels to ban them from endorsing healthy foods.

The move comes as part of sweeping reforms of the way food companies and supermarkets make health claims for thousands of popular products, ranging from "low-fat" ready meals to vitamin-enriched cereals.

The European Commission argues that shoppers are often misled by confusing or unproven health claims about foods. It wants to see each claim scientifically proven with strict controls on how foods are judged to be low fat, "diet" or low salt.

But in one of the most contentious proposals of all, it has recommended that charities should be barred completely from endorsing foods - a measure that would cost the British Heart Foundation alone more than £1m a year.

Commercial deals with supermarkets are a vital source of funds for major charities and play a vital part in public health campaigns.

Cancer Research UK earns about £500,000 a year with Tesco, while the BHF has tie-ins with Tetley's and Shredded Wheat.

The proposals are being fought by the Government, MEPs, health experts and food retailers. Backed by the European Parliament, the UK is pressing for a compromise deal, which could mean that charities and retailers must get scientific approval for each endorsement.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in