4chan iCloud 'expert' from CNN thinks 4chan is a person and 'pa$$word' is a good password
CNN 'technology analyst': 'Who is this 4chan person? We just don't know'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Although the average non-tech-savvy internet user could probably be forgiven for not knowing what 4chan is, most of us would expect the ‘technology analyst’ of an international TV news channel would know better. Right? Wrong.
CNN’s Brett Larson was lambasted far and wide across the web yesterday after he claimed that 4chan – an anonymous message board where those stolen celebrity photos were first posted – might be have been “a systems administrator who knew his away around and how to hack things”.
Okay, so, we admit that 4chan isn’t a household name (and definitely shouldn’t be) but confusing a website with a person hardly inspires confidence in a so-called technology expert (see below for the video).
To make matters worse Larson – in between suppressing chuckles at all those women who were stupid enough to think their private photos might have been, you know, private - went on to give some terrible security ‘advice’, suggesting that users replace their password ‘password’ with (drum roll please) ‘pa$$word’.
This is, of course, ABYSMAL advice. Basic letter substitutions such as ‘$’ for ‘S’ or ‘3’ for ‘E’ have been part of a standard password-guessing toolkit for decades. Instead users should be avoiding common words or phrases (and anything with personal significance) all together - and turning on two-step verification just to be on the safe side.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments