Letter: Banana battles

Glenys Kinnock (mep
Friday 22 January 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Deborah Orr ("Don't bend to the Americans", 15 January) asserts that the banana dispute has united the European Union. I wish that that were the case.

There are remaining tensions between member states which want to buy bananas from our traditional suppliers and others which would prefer to open up the market and improve access for dollar bananas from Latin American countries.

The EU has for many years supported our traditional suppliers in the Caribbean by offering terms of trade which give them the chance to prosper through their own efforts rather than someone else's aid. US banana companies, in particular Chiquita, are determined to threaten a system which presents no threat to them but, if removed, would destroy small banana farmers in the Caribbean.

The World Trade Organisation ruled against the European Union's banana regime some months ago and so a new system was devised. However, the US maintains that the new regime is still incompatible with the rules and has invoked article 301 of the US Trade Act, which provides for unilateral action.

In the meantime we continue to wait for a ruling on the new regime from the WTO. If the worst happens and the EU fails what will Bill Clinton do? Is he proposing a massive aid package to assist efforts to diversify and maintain economic stability? Should we wait to see the banana industry disappear and then work out how to deal with the resulting disaster?

GLENYS KINNOCK (MEP)

(South Wales East, Labour)

Brussels

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in