The Passion of The Christ

This is a pointless and unsatisfying offering

Andrew Buncombe
Thursday 26 February 2004 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Mel Gibson's latest offering is brutal, bloody, intense and relentless. It is also overwhelmingly pointless.

Because The Passion of the Christ is devoted entirely to Jesus' last 12 hours, only in flashback scenes does the audience see other parts of his life, glimpses of his childhood, snatches of his gentle, uplifting teaching, time spent with his friends.

As a result what one gets is 120 minutes filled to the brim with graphic violence and pain, as Christ is first tortured and then crucified. Often it feels as though the violence is there for the sake of violence, which may well be Gibson's point. It is also the film's problem.

Given the controversy surrounding the build-up to The Passion and given Gibson's religious background, it is all but impossible to watch the film outside of that context. Gibson has made clear that he has a message to deliver. The message delivered by this vehicle is that man is savage, weak and barbaric while Christ is pure and loving and the only hope for man's redemption.

That, of course, is part of the message of Christianity, but Gibson's lust for violence means there is room for little else. Whatever there is in the film of forgiveness and hope is drowned out by the gore. The scene of Christ's left hand being nailed to the cross, for instance, is almost pornographic in its excess while the soundtrack seems more suited to a horror movie, which this may well be. Other parts of the film carry more than a passing resemblance to the torture scenes featuring Gibson himself in Braveheart . (One can think of several other of Gibson's films in which he is subjected to torture.)

The film is unsatisfying. There is little or no tension: we all know what is going to happen. And for all of Gibson's intentions it is surprisingly unspiritual. He may have wished his audience to come away feeling uplifted or moved. In reality they are likely to feel little more than nausea.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in