Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

comment

Henry VIII had a cook boiled to death – but what does that have to do with the Rwanda bill?

As Sunak’s plan for migrants is mauled in the House of Lords, its fate could rest on an unlikely legal precedent – a fatal food poisoning at a Tudor dinner party, says Lord Falconer

Monday 11 March 2024 13:20 GMT
Comments
‘The Bishop of Rochester’s dinner party in 1531 has paved the way for Rishi Sunak to attempt to exclude asylum seekers from the protection of the law’
‘The Bishop of Rochester’s dinner party in 1531 has paved the way for Rishi Sunak to attempt to exclude asylum seekers from the protection of the law’ (Getty)

It was a dinner party thrown by the Bishop of Rochester in 1531 that paved the way for Rishi Sunak to attempt to exclude asylum seekers from the protection of the law. Lord Hoffmann, the greatest judge of the last 40 years, told us the tale in the Lords last month.

After the party, guests became sick. One of them died. Suspicion fell on the cook, Richard Roose. Henry VIII, who had a morbid horror of being poisoned, promoted an act of parliament declaring that poisoning was treason, the penalty for which was to be boiled alive; and – this is the point – that Roose had been guilty of this crime.

No trial was to take place. The king was no doubt concerned that “lefty lawyers” might get him off. Roose was duly boiled alive before an appreciative audience at Smithfield.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in