Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

comment

Speaker would have faced sack by Starmer if he had not caved in on Gaza debate

Sir Lindsay Hoyle tried to change the rules to help Labour avoid a split vote over a Gaza ceasefire but ended up pleading for his job, writes John Rentoul

Thursday 22 February 2024 10:35 GMT
Comments
Speaker of the House of Commons Sir Lindsay Hoyle announces he has selected amendments tabled by Labour
Speaker of the House of Commons Sir Lindsay Hoyle announces he has selected amendments tabled by Labour (PA Wire)

While hostages languish in tunnels and another bit of Gaza is reduced to rubble, the British House of Commons did what it does best: played with words and argued about procedure.

Sir Lindsay Hoyle, the speaker, announced that all three main parties could have a vote on their form of words on the conflict between Israel and Hamas. There was uproar because this was a breach of convention. Indeed, the noisiest protests came when he said that the rules of the Commons were “outdated”.

Outdated? Scottish National Party and Conservative MPs were outraged. These were ancient rules, part of the birthright of freeborn Britons (including Scots) and a guarantee of our democratic freedoms. Or something. They date from, er, 1979.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in