UK Anti-Doping watchdog is not fit for purpose
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Another Sunday, another damaging revelation about alleged doping in individual sports. We have grown accustomed to claims about athletics, cycling, swimming and recently even tennis. But the latest allegations in The Sunday Times went even further – that a London doctor prescribed banned performance-enhancing drugs to 150 top sportspeople including footballers, cricketers, boxers and martial arts competitors, as well as cyclists and tennis players.
Despite the usual denials, we might be forgiven for thinking that no sport is now immune. The Government has ordered an inquiry into whether the UK Anti-Doping watchdog ignored evidence about the doctor’s activities. It should be a searching one, not a stalling device, and look into whether Dr Mark Bonar slipped through the net because he worked in more than one sport. Dr Bonar insists that the drugs were prescribed for medical reasons, and that any performance-enhancing was a secondary effect.
John Whittingdale, the Culture, Media and Sport Secretary, was right to order the inquiry and to raise the prospect of stronger criminal sanctions. Ministers, who are usually reluctant to intervene, should also address whether self-regulation by some of sport's governing bodies is fit for purpose.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments