The Paxman factor: Give the former 'Newsnight' titan a regular slot

 

Editorial
Friday 27 March 2015 20:39 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

First it was the sneer. Then the piercing questions and instinctive aggression. Finally there was the almost equine expression of dismay with each answer.

They all said the same thing: I’m Jeremy Paxman, and I’m back.

Paxman was the decisive victor in Thursday night’s non-debate with David Cameron and Ed Miliband. A predictable portion of the reaction on social media and elsewhere criticised him for his curmudgeonly manner and apparent cynicism, but this was to miss the point. The aim of television interviews with politicians is to apply democratic scrutiny, to interrogate positions so that the viewer can learn something new about the subject. If you happen to be entertaining along the way, that’s a bonus.

Paxo satisfied all these conditions. To pick on Mr Cameron for a moment – which is only fair, given his shameful refusal to debate Mr Miliband head to head – we learned, via Paxo’s interview, the following: that he doesn’t know how many food banks there are in Britain, can’t say how much his Government had borrowed, and is able to admit that he had hopelessly missed his foolish target on immigration. He was made to squirm in a way that was most pleasing.

All this is a boon to Britain’s crumbling democracy. Indeed, we need more of it. David Abraham and Jay Hunt, the chief executive and the chief creative officer of Channel 4 respectively, have won plaudits for the reinvention of their television station and its subsidiaries. They have produced several innovative formats and attracted strong ratings. And all the while they have talked up their “unique public service remit, given to us by Parliament… to take creative risks”.

In which case they should make an urgent priority of putting Paxman back on our screens, at the very least on a weekly basis, to interrogate those who work for us in Westminster and Whitehall. From his performance on Thursday, you get the impression Paxo would be up for it. The British public certainly is.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in