The Islamist threat to the Winter Games in Sochi is real

In the short term, Vladimir Putin will deal with the terrorist threat to his showcase Games by tightening a formidable range of security measures already in place

Editorial
Sunday 29 December 2013 20:34 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In the run-up to the Winter Olympics in Sochi, which open in February, attention here has been on whether politicians and athletes should boycott the Games in protest over Russia’s increasingly harsh discrimination against gays and lesbians.

The horrific suicide bombing in Volgograd, in southern Russia, is a sudden reminder that the real threat to the Sochi Games is not a Western boycott but an Islamist terror attack. The blast at a railway station, which has killed at least 18 people, was not the first in Volgograd. A bus bombing in October killed five people. The Russians identified that bomber as a woman from Dagestan, one of a patchwork of small, mainly Muslim, autonomous republics in the Caucasus.

Worryingly for Russia, Dagestan is almost as unstable now as neighbouring Chechnya used to be in the 1990s, when the Russians battled a separatist insurgency there. Nor is Chechnya entirely pacified. In July, the leader of the Chechen rebel Islamists vowed to stop the Games from proceeding in Sochi, “on the bones of our ancestors, the bones of many dead Muslims”. So far, while nothing has happened in Sochi, the militants seem to have selected Volgograd as an alternative, perhaps because it is the nearest big city north of the Caucasus.

In the short term, Vladimir Putin will deal with the terrorist threat to his showcase Games by tightening a formidable range of security measures already in place round Sochi. Having proclaimed in advance that the Games would be “the safest Olympics ever”, he will want to see that pledge honoured.

Whether Russia can ever restore lasting peace in the North Caucasus is doubtful. It lacks the manpower to keep all the republics in lockdown simultaneously. Nor is the policy of periodically replacing obdurate local leaders with pliant ones effective.

In a sense, Russia is paying a delayed price for those colonial 19th-century wars – in which Tolstoy took part and wrote about – which have saddled Russia with lands that it can neither absorb nor relinquish. Regrettably, violence looks set to continue, even if not in Sochi.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in