Sensible Laws: Politicians should not frame teaching priorities

 

Editorial
Monday 03 November 2014 00:18 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The schools minister, David Laws, has told us he thinks there has been a “corrosive impact” from political interference in what is taught to children. Curriculums should not be set by “the whims of here-today-gone-tomorrow politicians”. Who could he possibly have had mind?

Well not just the Secretary of State with whom he worked, Michael Gove – whose literary tastes and views about history soon became very familiar. The first national curriculum was set by Kenneth Baker decades ago, an Education Secretary with equally developed opinions about what the kids should be reading. Prime ministers, too, have declared the desirability of the three Rs and the like.

So one problem with having ministers framing teaching priorities is a lack of consistency apart, that is, from a predictable tendency to small “c” conservatism. Another is that it really is the sort of thing that prevails in totalitarian states, as the many students fascinated by the Third Reich would remind us. Much better, as Mr Laws suggests, to try a more consensual approach and one that draws on the experience of the teachers. Our island story is still a fascinating one, but we don’t need a politician to turn it into a state-approved compulsory truth.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in