Israeli-Palestinian conflict: An ever deeper divide

Where is the leadership as violence scars Jerusalem?

Editorial
Tuesday 18 November 2014 22:51 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The terrorist attack on a synagogue in West Jerusalem that left four worshippers dead has reduced the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – if that were possible – to new depths of hopelessness.

A new cycle of violence has started, with no prospect of an end in the foreseeable future. The distinction this time is that the attack appears to be linked to pressure from ultra-Orthodox Jews to be allowed to pray at the site known to them as Temple Mount – which Muslims believe is the place where the Prophet Mohamed ascended to heaven.

Hitherto, only Muslims have been allowed to worship there – a position reaffirmed recently by the Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, – but even talk of change has caused outrage in the Islamic world. The attack may or may not signify that a third Palestinian intifada, or uprising, has begun; more to the point, the two sides may be about to add religious war to the other, seemingly unbridgeable, differences that separate them. The last round of US-brokered peace talks, aimed at a two-state solution, collapsed barely six months ago. But it seems an eternity. Since then, there has been a third Gaza war. Sweden has recognised a Palestinian state and the UK Parliament has symbolically voted to do so. Jerusalem, the city both sides claim as their capital, is riven by suspicion and mutual fear; Israeli and Palestinian teenagers have been victims of reprisal killings.

Israel, meanwhile, continues to expand settlements in the occupied West Bank, while the relationship between Mr Netanyahu – whose evident goal is to weaken the Palestinians to the point of irrelevance – and his Palestinian counterpart, Mahmoud Abbas, could not be worse.

Yet any de-escalation of the latest crisis must start with these two leaders. Terror attacks against civilians are odious and utterly unjustifiable. But inflammatory statements from both of them have stoked, deliberately or otherwise, a spiral of violence and frustration that can lead nowhere. Action to halt it must come from the top.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in