If young men are choosing not to go to university, so be it

One expert is suggesting that less onerous entry requirements should apply to males

Editorial
Thursday 30 January 2014 20:07 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Educationalists are starting to warn of a gender crisis in Britain’s universities. Even as the gap in applications from rich and poor students is narrowing, that between males and females is markedly widening.

The numbers are certainly striking. A whopping 87,000 more women than men are hoping to enter tertiary education this autumn, some 7,000 more even than last year. Indeed, female school-leavers are now a third more likely to go on to university than their male counterparts.

Cue worried talk of young men as a disadvantaged group requiring special attention. One expert is even suggesting that less onerous entry requirements should apply to males. That suggestion, at least, can swiftly be dismissed. Not only because it would make a mockery of the long (and far from finished) fight for equality. Not even because it would undermine the credibility of our world-class university system. But also because it would – rightly – be illegal.

What of the wider issue, though? There are some statistical points to consider – the impact of shifting female-dominated teacher – and nurse-training into universities, for example. But there is no doubt that boys are lagging behind not only in university applications but also in GCSE and A-level results.

Insofar as the aim is to ensure that all children reach their educational potential, we must, of course, be aware of such trends. But it would be as well not to get carried away. After so many decades of boys routinely outperforming girls, the notion of a crisis, after just a few years of reversal, is somewhat precipitous. There is also the small matter of individual choice. If young men decide that they would rather go straight into paid employment, or that they would prefer an apprenticeship to an academic qualification, or even that they are not interested – so be it.

It is up to the educational establishment to create institutions that are open to all who wish to attend them. It is neither necessary nor desirable for universities to engage in social engineering. Nor should we judge them by anything other than their students’ aptitudes. So long as the only barrier to male participation is individual choice, there is no crisis.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in