Editorial: The crime of arresting whistleblowers

It is not difficult to see how the Cumbria force could get carried away in the aftermath of the phone-hacking scandal

Independent Voices
Friday 19 April 2013 19:23 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It is worrying enough that a newly elected Police and Crime Commissioner should be spending £700 on a chauffeur-driven Mercedes – even more so given growing complaints of cronyism and waste by PCCs. But what is more alarming still is that three people have been arrested for leaking Richard Rhodes’s inflated expenses to a newspaper.

Rather than being arrested, the three civilian police workers should be publicly commended. Had they not acted, Mr Rhodes’s self-indulgence would have remained hidden, leaving the public purse to bear not only this particular extravagance but any number of future excesses as well.

It is not difficult to see how the Cumbria force could get carried away in the aftermath of the phone-hacking scandal. After all, Operation Elveden – set up to investigate allegations of the widespread bribery of public officials – has resulted in some 60 arrests so far, the vast majority of them journalists and police. One former chief inspector has been sent to jail.

But there is a clear distinction to be drawn between a police officer sharing confidential information for money, kudos or any other perk, and a whistleblower – police or otherwise – who breaks ranks in order to draw attention to matters of safety, inappropriate behaviour or the improper use of public funds. For all the wrongdoing revealed in recent years, the “public interest” defence remains as fundamental, and as justifiable, as ever. And Cumbria is surely an unambiguous example of it in action.

There is also a wider point here. Reporting of suspected wrongdoing is lamentably rare in Britain in comparison with the US. Too often our institutions make it harder. It took the recent high-profile case of Gary Walker – the former head of a hospital trust who risked having his £500,000 pay-off withdrawn after he raised concerns about patient safety – for NHS staff to be given the legal right to go public about care issues.

Britain needs more whistleblowers, not fewer. The Cumbria arrests are a step in the wrong direction.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in