Editorial: The bishops in the House of Lords are the least of the problem

After the collapse of the Liberal Democrats’ proposals for House of Lords reform last year, some new impetus is certainly needed

Independent Voices
Thursday 09 May 2013 21:51 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Frank Field has some interesting ideas about the bishops in the House of Lords. As he rightly notes, the voting record of the 16 incumbents is woeful. Perhaps the new Archbishop of Canterbury could put his appetite for political influence to work with a reshuffle, replacing the most lethargic with others – perhaps not even from within the Church – who will play a more active role. Better still, Mr Field suggests that such a move might be the basis of further, more radical, reform of the second chamber.

After the collapse of the Liberal Democrats’ proposals last year, some new impetus is certainly needed. But a tweak in the line-up of our clerical lawmakers is still just tinkering around the edges. It is the 90-odd people who legislate on the basis of birth alone who are the more egregious travesty of our supposed democracy. It is the ending of that inexcusable anachronism that must be the priority.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in