Editorial: Our obsession with TV isn’t all bad news
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It sounds paradoxical that we now have fewer televisions on average than we did a decade ago – 1.8 per household as opposed to 2.3 – yet we still end up watching more television: half an hour more a day since 2006 alone.
On one level, the trend is alarming. As we are only awake for about 16 hours a day, ceding another half-hour of that to the TV in just six years, taking the figure over the four-hour mark, seems a lot. Should we spend a quarter of our waking lives in front of the telly?
On the bright side, we are probably becoming more discriminating, as the paradox of watching more TV on fewer TVs is explained by the rise of computers, which at least oblige users to seek out the programmes they want.
The box as a background noise, or as a large object in front of which the whole family sat slumped and semi-comatose, is becoming ancient history. For that, we should be grateful.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments