Editorial: Bigger conservatories are no answer
Rather than tinker at the edges of the construction industry, the Government should focus on tackling our acute housing crisis
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Eric Pickles did not have an easy task in the Commons yesterday. The Communities Secretary was charged with defending the Government’s planning proposals not only against the Opposition but also against a cadre of Coalition naysayers. In the end, he won the vote – but by a slim margin, and only with the promise of a “revised approach”. Even then, several Tories rebelled.
According to its proponents, a three-year easing of the planning rules for residential extensions will be a boon for “aspirational families”, will lift Britain’s flagging construction sector, and will be a much-needed boost for retailers of carpets, furniture and the like. “Getting the planners off our backs”, as the Prime Minister puts it, might look good on paper. What is being overlooked, though, is that planners are – when it comes to domestic extensions, at least – on our backs for good reason. Loosen the restrictions and the result will be costly and antagonistic neighbourly disputes.
Even more importantly, the plan is tilting at the wrong target. True, the construction industry is suffering. But rather than tinker at the edges with a temporary burst of plus-sized conservatory-building, the Government should focus on tackling our acute housing crisis.
Although Britain needs an extra 250,000 homes every year to meet growing demand, fewer than 100,000 are being built. Why? Because the handful of large private developers have little incentive to do so and investment in social housing is paltry. The result is sky-high prices, both for buying and renting. Yet instead of channelling what money there is into building – to ease the bottleneck and help the economy – the Chancellor is underwriting cheap mortgages and fuelling ever more demand.
Mr Pickles, meanwhile, must make the empty argument that a few more, larger extensions will do the trick. That Coalition rebels have now forced compromise is welcome. But, with no more – so far – than a ministerial promise to go on, it is still too soon to celebrate.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments