Don’t knock ‘health and safety’. It saves lives

The risk is not of a society bound and gagged by red tape

Editorial
Friday 18 April 2014 18:55 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It is a pity that the Health and Safety Executive has, as far as we know, yet to lay out its concerns on the excessive gnashing of teeth, because the molars of those who detest such “red tape” are in danger of being ground to smithereens. The latest sign that Britain has succumbed to a spineless form of bureaucracy is offered by the Conservative health and safety minister, who has warned schools and councils that the rules are being misapplied by ignorant “jobsworths”.

There are indeed examples of astonishing daftness. From the pupil whose plan to bring a chick into assembly was blocked for fear of its causing an outbreak bird flu, to the Manchester council that barred mourners from leaving loose flowers and pots on graves, the Health and Safety myth-busters’ panel – created to challenge inappropriate and illegitimate regulation – has had 300 cases to keep it employed over the past two years.

And yet, much as minister Mike Penning is right to condemn such misapplications of the rules, any attempt to bundle them up into the wider campaign against health and safety legislation – led by the Tory right – must be resisted. In 2010, David Cameron referred to a “monster” of red tape holding back small businesses. But the introduction of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act in 1974 led to decades of progress in protecting labourers from risk: 651 employees were killed in work clothes that year; by 2013, that toll had fallen to 148. It’s a peculiar sort of monster that compels employers to ensure, for example, that their staff aren’t exposed to asbestos, and can do their job at minimal risk of burns, bruises or an accidental battering.

In 2011, the Health and Safety Executive budget was cut by 35 per cent. Last week, Baroness Donaghy, author of the landmark 2009 report One Death Too Many, expressed fears that as a result of that reduction, the construction industry had become a “ticking time bomb” – with employers starting to cut corners once more. At a time of high employment but low job security, the risk is not of a society bound and gagged by red tape, but of the erosion of a vital consensus: you may give sweat at work, but never blood.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in