Bonus question: Is it a bit soon for the reward culture to return to banking?

 

Editorial
Wednesday 04 March 2015 00:44 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If the banking industry had begun to function properly, one might expect that bonuses and fines would not go hand in hand. After all, that was the old way: the great City fruit machine paid out for staff whether their gambles paid off or not.

So for Barclays to reward its chief executive, Antony Jenkins, with his first bonus since taking over the job in 2012, at the same time as setting aside vast amounts to cover future fines, suggests the system is still not working. But that would be to confuse the need to incentivise a banker who has an eye on the future with a bank that is still wrestling with the huge cost of past misdemeanours.

That Mr Jenkins has made progress is not in doubt. The investment banking division, the legacy of his predecessor Bob Diamond’s global ambition and a source of huge profit and huge conduct problems, has been shrunk. In an effort to rebalance Barclays, its high street bank and Barclaycard are performing better. But of great concern is the extra £750m set aside for fines relating to the alleged rigging of the foreign exchange market, taking Barclays’ total in this area to £1.25bn. After all provisions were totted up, the bank’s profits slumped by a fifth to £2.3bn.

For a chief executive who has preached the importance of banks reforming themselves, it is still impossible to claim the past has been left behind. Some four years ago, Mr Diamond said that the time for banker remorse was over. Since then, Libor rigging, the misselling of payment protection insurance, sanctions busting, money laundering and murky tax affairs have blighted the industry.

At least Barclays’ investors will receive more in dividends than its investment bankers get in bonuses. But it is hard not to think that the bank and its peers must do more to prove they are matching pay closely to performance. It is an issue close to the heart of Barclays’ new chairman, John McFarlane, who promises to speed up reform when he begins the job next month. As he should.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in