Beyond gender: The concept of 'God' has always been androgynous
How can women progress in the Church if its spiritual leadership is considered male by nature?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The concept of “God” – despite the largely male-authored history of religious belief – is in its nature neither male nor female. Such mysterious movements as we can detect or believe in as an act of faith seem to have description in human gender. The Greeks, Romans and Vikings, it is true, were fond of gender stereotyping their deities – men for war, women for love, on the whole – but these too were expressions of cultural norms rather than any deeper truth. So it is when the God of the Christian Church is described routinely as “He”.
The call by Rachel Treweek, the newly-appointed Bishop of Gloucester, that God should be “degenderised” carries a good deal of weight, and should be supported. Instead of using either “He” or “She” to describe God, the Right Reverend reports that she prefers simply to use the word “God”. As she rightly points out: “If I am made in the image of God, then God is not to be seen as male. God is God.”
The scriptures may or may not support the ordination of women in ever more important posts in the Church of England, but there is nothing in the Bible, apart from some traditionally patriarchal language, that defines the Almighty as a male.
The naming of the divine and unknowable matters because it has more earthly implications: how can women progress in the Church if its spiritual leadership is considered male by nature? What a miracle it would be to see the world’s religions have women, gay, bisexual and transgender people in leadership positions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments