With Sandy Island finally off the map, who's to say any of us are really here

Tales From The Water Cooler

Donald Macinnes
Saturday 24 November 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

This week, Sandy Island in the South Pacific – which maps and charts had positioned midway between Australia and New Caledonia – was found not to exist. When scientists went to the area to study water depth, all they found was a lot of wetness and two jellyfish arguing over the suitability of Rafa Benitez as the new Chelsea manager. The puzzled boffins checked Google Earth and, sure enough, there was the island.

Only, it wasn't.

It seems this invisibility issue could just be the result of an initial human error, which was then repeated down the years. Really? Some map maker decides to have a sandwich at his desk, spills some HP sauce on his work, so an island appears in the South Pacific? Are things actually this random? It does make you wonder what else doesn't really exist on the map. Is New Zealand actually a dropped Twiglet? Was the Arctic Circle the result of someone not using a coaster? Are we, in fact, really here?

Australia's Hydrographic Service, which makes its nautical charts, has admitted that, while some map makers deliberately feature fake streets to stop copyright infringements, this didn't often happen with nautical charts as sailors need to be confident that their destination will be there when they arrive. Hold on… fake streets? Suddenly, all those hours spent driving in circles because my Sat-Nav tells me that I have reached Lewisham Tesco – when in actual fact I am teetering on the edge of the Grand Canyon – make perfect sense.

Twitter.com/DonaldAMacInnes

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in