Daily catch-up: stupid questions in opinion polls, in the House of Commons and in job interviews

A surprising theme emerges in today’s round-up of news from around the internet

John Rentoul
Thursday 27 November 2014 09:30 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

1. The Absurd Opinion-Poll Question Award is won by YouGov, for asking: “Do you think Jesus would support or oppose renationalising the railways, so they are run in the public sector rather than by private companies?”

Most people (56 per cent) said they didn't know, which was a rough approximation of the obvious answer, but the only one available; 38 per cent said He would support nationalisation, and 6 per cent that He would oppose it, which seems to confuse “What Would Jesus Do?” with “What Do I Agree With?”

More relevantly, perhaps, Peter A Russell reminded us: “He arrived by Virgin.”

2. Second Stupid Question of the Day was asked by Andrew Turner, Conservative MP for the Isle of Wight, of David Cameron at Prime Minister’s Questions.

“Does my right hon. Friend believe that Tony Blair should get a global legacy award from Save the Children for taking us to war unnecessarily in Iraq?”

The Prime Minister did not remind his hon. Friend that he had voted for military action in Iraq. He was only too aware that those people who disagreed with that decision had found yet another ingenious way of saying so. Therefore, he avoided the question:

“The remarkable thing about that award is that Tony Blair got it from someone who used to work for Gordon Brown. Obviously the person who gave the award knows about peacemaking and peacekeeping, but it is not for me to get involved.”

Unfortunately, in his eagerness to appease the haters, Cameron slandered Justin Forsyth, the head of Save the Children UK, who had nothing to do with Blair’s award, which was made – last week, but it takes the Not-in-My-Namers a while to catch up – by Save the Children in the US.

I know facts are pointless once the red mist of sanctimony descends (just as British Future observed that facts are useless in trying to change people’s minds on the subject of immigration), but Tony Blair’s office did try to remind us of some of them, and John McTernan mentioned some others.

3. I have reviewed James Cronin’s new history of the Anglo-American conspiracy that runs the world. Actually it is a sane and balanced account of the special relationship and how it has shaped the world, mostly for the better, since the Second World War. The haters won’t like it much, either.

It also has some fine footnotes.

4. More polling news. There was some confusion yesterday over a ComRes poll of 40 marginal seats, showing Labour 8 points ahead in those seats. This is not the same as saying that Labour is 8 points ahead across Great Britain. In those seats, Labour and Conservative were level in 2010, when the Tories had a lead in national vote share of 7 points. So this poll suggests that Labour is one point ahead nationally – in other words, roughly what the average GB polls suggest.

Also, Michael Ashcroft teased us by pre-announcing a constituency poll he has carried out in Doncaster North, Ed Miliband’s seat. The poll will be published today, and he says it will show UKIP in second place, “so if Tories tactically vote for UKIP Miliband loses”. Given that Miliband had 47 per cent of the vote last time, UKIP would have to be running him a pretty close second to make this a serious threat.

5. Stupid questions, part III. I am very much enjoying Randall Munroe's What If? book (sample illustration, right), subtitled, Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions.

6. And finally (stupid questions, part IV), thanks to Alex Dawson for this:

If asked in a job interview to describe yourself in three words why not try “violent when disappointed”?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in