Public intellectual AC Grayling wades into Oxford Union presidency row
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Philosopher Professor AC Grayling has waded into the row over whether Oxford Union president Ben Sullivan should stay in post while he is being investigated by police over rape allegations.
Mr Sullivan, 21, was arrested this month on suspicion of rape and the attempted rape of two undergraduates. He denies the allegations.
Professor Grayling, who is master of the New College of the Humanities, said the president should not be subject to the “kangaroo court of public opinion” and was innocent until proven guilty.
Professor Grayling, who was due to address the OU debating union last night, made his comments after a series of other speakers including Interpol general secretary Robert Noble, David Mepham, UK director of Human Rights Watch and Julie Meter, US entrepreneur and judge on BBC’s Dragon’s Den, all pulled out of addressing the union.
Professor Grayling, in a letter to Sarah Pine, the Oxford University Student Union vice-president for women, who urged speakers to pull out, said: “Asking people to convict and punish someone before due process of law has taken its course is a bad direction to go in and with great respect I urge you to reflect on that.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments