'Joke' schedule at French Open leaves Rafael Nadal in a furious mood
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.After Rafael Nadal won six of his eight comeback tournaments and reached the finals of the two others, the expectation in some quarters was that winning his eighth French Open title would be little more than a walk in the Bois de Boulogne for the 26-year-old Spanish star.
For the second round in succession, however, Nadal lost the opening set yesterday before easing to a 4-6, 6-3, 6-3, 6-3 over Slovakia’s Martin Klizan. Within 24 hours, Nadal will be back on court today to face Fabio Fognini, who has already beaten Tomas Berdych and Richard Gasquet during the current clay-court season. To Nadal’s displeasure, moreover, the 26-year-old Italian will have had an extra day to prepare, having completed his own second-round victory over Lukas Rosol on Thursday evening before rain curtailed play for the day.
Nadal did not hold back in his criticism of tournament organisers for their scheduling. Fognini’s match on Thursday was second on court, following a women’s singles, while Nadal was scheduled as the third match on another court, after a women’s singles and a men’s singles.
After a day waiting in vain to get on court, Nadal and Klizan were sent home and had to return for an 11am start yesterday. “Today I was playing almost three hours on court and my opponent [tomorrow] was watching the TV in the locker room,” Nadal declared at the press conference.
The defending champion said he had been told that the Fognini-Rosol match had been scheduled earlier because Rosol had to play doubles later in the afternoon. “I am sorry, but that’s a joke,” Nadal said. “You have one more week to play doubles if you want to play doubles. Why do you want to protect a player who has to play doubles? So I’m going to put myself in the doubles draw then and I have the priority to play? That’s not the right excuse to make a schedule like this.”
Having built up a head of steam, Nadal then launched into the world rankings, repeating his belief that they should be based on results over two years rather than one. “When you get an injury like [Juan Martin] del Potro for nine months you come back as No 900 in the world, but you are clearly not No 900 in the world,” he said.
Nadal said he would not object to a longer season – he would be happy to have a 12-month schedule because it would create more opportunities for more people to make a living from the sport – provided there was a reduction in the number of mandatory tournaments. Under the present system, players have to compete in four Grand Slam events and eight Masters Series tournaments.
Roger Federer, who reached the fourth round by beating Julien Benneteau 6-3, 6-4, 7-5, had some sympathy for Nadal over the scheduling but said diplomatically that tournament organisers “didn’t do it on purpose. They do their best.”
Maria Sharapova will have to play catch-up after completing her delayed second-round match over Eugenie Bouchard. Serena Williams is already through to the fourth round after beating Sorana Cirstea 6-0, 6-2. The world No 1 has dropped just six games in her first three matches.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments