Suker sharedealing defended
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ARSENAL SAID yesterday that it was "absolutely absurd" to suggest that Davor Suker had compromised his commitment to the north London club by purchasing pounds 20,000 worth of shares in Manchester United.
"Davor's professionalism is beyond question," an Arsenal spokeswoman said after it was revealed that the Croatian international striker bought 8,646 shares in the Old Trafford club last month. "He has not broken any rules and his business dealings are his own."
Suker, who moved to Arsenal from Real Madrid in August for pounds 1.3m, said that his investment was a simple foray into the stock market. "I don't understand the chemicals market or other stocks but I know about football," he said. "I also have shares in Lazio. There is no particular reason why I have Manchester United shares except that I just like this market."
The Football Association, which prohibits players from betting on matches, defended Suker's right to gamble on the stock exchange. "There's no rule against it," a spokesman said. "So long as it's not more than a 10 per cent stake in a whole club, it is regarded as for investment purposes only. He added that there is "no contradiction in the rules" which allows one form of financial speculation on football but disallows another.
Several players are believed to have holdings in former sides, even after moving elsewhere.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments