Sports Letters: Panel of judges
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As one who spends most winter Saturday afternoons umpiring hockey, I have always been struck by the burdens imposed upon rugby union referees.
Time and again the referee appears to require eyes in the back of his head if, for example, he is to keep track of the defending side's backs while simultaneously controlling a ruck or maul in front of him.
Since the scope for illegalities in the ruck is clearly great, it is hardly surprising if referees sometimes seem to concentrate on that and end up letting offsides go by.
Perhaps the rugby authorities should consider empowering the touch judges to act like linesmen in football and signal offsides to the referee.
A greater fear of being caught offside because three pairs of eyes are on the job might go some way to counteracting the growing ability of defences to stifle attacking play.
Yours sincerely,
BRIAN DITCHAM
Acton
5 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments