Sports Letters: Offside, ref] Isn't it?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The 'goals' scored on Sunday by Preece and Cantona may have made a few people wonder about the results of 'interpretation' of the laws of the game.
At Selhurst, had the 'goal' come from a more mundane effort by a Wimbledon player rather than a spectacular shot from Eric Cantona, would it, I wonder. Yes, the referee is the man in charge and if he says a player wasn't offside, or if he was it didn't matter then he wasn't and it didn't - even if he was and it did. But the laws of the game are perfectly clear on that matter and a player in an offside position is offside - even if the referee says he wasn't or he wasn't intending to 'interfere with the play.'
Unless there is some consistency in the actions of officials, we shall always have arguments, and the FA may regret giving referees vague advice on interpreting the offside law.
Yours faithfully,
A J ALLAM
Old Coulsdon, Surrey
21 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments